Thursday, March 22, 2007

Which Linux distro? The perennial question

Well its time to do what seems like my annual Linux installfest where I get a new machine and decide which is the best Linux distro to see me through the next year.

I blew away my Ubuntu-themed Gentoo machine and installed Backtrack. That didn't work out because of slackware. So I needed an alternative. My distro had to meet the following criteria:
So that left meant Debian based distros were out for points 2 & 3, Fedora was a contender but the choice came down to:
Sabayon 3.3 just blew me away. I love it. It is so functional AND beautiful. But all beauty has its flaws... Sabayon the testing package tree from Gentoo. This leads to massive problems upgrading packages. I have persisted with this because its so nice, but the jury is still out.

VLOS (formerly Vida Linux) is great, Anaconda installer, some basic binary packages (OpenOffice, Firefox) to get you going quickly. I really like this distro and will use it for all my future Gentoo only installs, but it lacked the polish of Sabayon.

Gentoo by hand... only for servers. Not doing it again for Desktop, I use VLOS if Sabayon doesn't pan out. I'm tired of long winded manual installs and configuring a million text config files by hand (especially X).

Backtrack - Great distro, poor choice of base OS

One of my colleagues has got me using Backtrack for pen testing. I have used Whoppix/Whax in the past but Backtrack has come a long way since then.

I was really enjoying it until I tried to install OpenOffice and Krusder... dependency hell. I like Slackware but I've said it before, its package management sucks to put it bluntly. Why couldn't the Backtrack developers have chosen Debian, Fedora, Gentoo etc etc as a base. Any distro with a modern packagement system.

Great distro but tarballs are so old school, I guess I have been spoilt by Gentoo. Backtrack is destined for a VM but not my primary Linux pen testing desktop.

Friday, March 02, 2007

Lack of (security) innovation in the USA?

I am finding that the security resources that I rely on out on the Internet, are more and more based outside of the US.

I am not sure why but I have a few theories, firstly all of the early innovators have sold out, either to a big corporation (McAfee, Symantec et al) or have gone commercial (Sourcefire, Tenable).

Secondly, potential litigation in US might also be scaring off the innovators from openly publishing their works. A good example is the Oedipus project, where the author of the software's employer claimed copyright in part of the work causing a promising project to be pulled from the 'net, not to mention the wrangling over issues such as the ownership of the Ethereal name (now WireShark). Lets face it Information Security is big business and $.

Thirdly and finally it could be that talent is being snapped up by big consulting firms and security vendors in Graduate and Post-Graduate programs. Anyway this is nothing more than opinion with not much to back it up (like most blogs ;-)

Some of the non-US sites that have been grabbing my attention recently (and some not so recently) are:

Tips for end-users

Here are some nice security tips for system and email security for newbies and end users.

IT Security has got a list of the Top 25 Most Common Email Mistakes People Make and how to protect against them along with an article The 20 Minute Guide to Securing Your PC: 20 Tips to Secure Your Box.

If all end users followed these steps we wouldn't see some of the botnet and worm activity that we have seen to date.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?